Search for: "Million v State" Results 4981 - 5000 of 24,660
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2020, 10:53 am by Brian G. Cesaratto
 See, e.g., New York State Stop Hacks and Improve Electronic Data Security Act (SHIELD Act). [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:53 pm by Jennifer Lynch
This week, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:32 am by CMS
  Case law has found that a jurisdiction agreement in an insurance contract does not bind a third party beneficiary of insurance who is domiciled in a different contracting state and who has not expressly subscribed to the clause (Société financière et industrielle du Peloux v Axa Belgium (Case C112/03) [2006] QB 251). [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not… [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:11 am by CMS
The proposed class is vast, comprising an estimated 46.2 million people. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
United States The Verge had a piece on a group of Senate Republicans planning to introduce a privacy bill that would regulate the data collected by coronavirus contact tracing apps. [read post]
3 May 2020, 12:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
According to the complaint, the breach affected more than 10.2 million LabCorp patients. [read post]
2 May 2020, 7:03 pm by Francis Pileggi
The April 21 decision was the second time Elburn’s sued over a $50 million IBI stock award and cleared the pre-suit demand hurdle. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:40 pm by Bijal Vira and Nirav Bhatt
 26 CFR § 1.1471-5(i)(2) states that, for federal tax income purposes, an “expanded affiliated group” is generally defined in accordance with the principles of the IRS Code to mean one or more chains of entities connected through ownership by a common parent entity. [read post]
1 May 2020, 11:17 am by Scott Hervey
The matter came to the Supreme Court in Romag Fasteners Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 4:24 am by Riana Harvey
 The Deputy Judge stated the importance of comparing the respective marks as a whole, rather than focusing on similarities and differences in their individual features. [read post]
Katrina is the most notable example, with insurers paying out approximately $900 million in coverage notwithstanding flood exclusions. [read post]