Search for: "Morris's Case"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 5,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2007, 3:51 am
The justices ruled that the California appeals court should take another look at the case in light of its February 20, 2007 ruling that set aside an award to a smoker suing Altria Group Inc.'s Philip Morris USA unit. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
The answer is yes, but only in certain types of cases. [read post]
22 May 2007, 9:49 am
" That case is set for trial this November. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:21 am
"
Court: Cross-Ethnic Identifications Require No Special Jury Charge "Cross-ethnic eyewitness identification of criminal suspects does not necessitate the specially tailored jury charge used in cross-racial identification cases, the New Jersey Supreme Court rules. [read post]
21 May 2007, 12:53 am
Duane Morris' Construction Practice Picks Up Three Reed Smith Partners
The Legal Intelligencer
In an effort to expand its construction litigation practice firmwide, Duane Morris has added three partners to the group in its Pittsburgh office. [read post]
20 May 2007, 5:01 pm
The court sent the case back. [read post]
19 May 2007, 9:18 pm
Morris has an article "Thoughts on Patent-Bashing, Obviously" which includes the statement by Albert Einstein: "Opinions about obviousness are to a certain extent a function of time. [read post]
18 May 2007, 7:06 am
In a Ford rollover case with a $55M punitive damage award, the US Supreme Court has remanded the punitive damages for consideration in light of the recent case of Philip Morris v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:24 pm
Chris Gregoire signed the legislation that bars payments by criminal defendants to charitable causes in hopes of having charges reduced or their cases dismissed. [read post]
17 May 2007, 10:28 am
In any case, why is there a preamble at all? [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:20 pm
Savage had this article in the LA Times on the High Court's decision to send a case involving a $55 million jury award against Ford Motor Co. back to a California appeals court for further consideration in light of the recent Philip Morris vs. [read post]
15 May 2007, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court: Hospital Privileges Must Be Revealed in Med-Mal Cases. [read post]
15 May 2007, 7:59 am
The Triple Helix Dilemma Revisited [2007-18]Richard DelgadoJean Stefancic
Neutral Citation, Court Web Sites, and Access to Authoritative Case Law [2007-19]Peter W. [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:43 am
I've posted a good bit on Philip Morris v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
This is the conundrum the Supreme Court has left in the wake of its recent Philip Morris ruling on punitive damages awards. [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:38 pm
Reynolds and Philip Morris for Mrs. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
Philip Morris is again in the Supreme Court, not testing the limits of punitive damages, but as Tony Sebok relates at FindLaw, about its claim the case should be in federal court instead of state. [read post]
11 May 2007, 4:22 am
"Morris said conflicts are "where you have co-defendants or for some other reason people w can't represent and that's about ten or twelve percent of the cases" we handle.He said no decision has been made on how conflict cases will be handled but added "the public defender's office is not eligible to represent conflict cases. [read post]
10 May 2007, 6:26 am
" Two other archetypes are presented: The first is Duane Morris, which has aggressively (overly so?) [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
Whether such "futures" claim even constitute constitutional "cases or controversies" is questionable. [read post]
