Search for: "People v Thomas"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 5,937
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 11:36 am
(Thomas Dunlap, the Copyright Group’s lead attorney, did not respond for comment.) [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm
This week in Ashcroft v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
In Marbury v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
A new report has said that an artificial intelligence watchdog should be set up to make sure people are not discriminated against by the automated computer systems making important decisions about their lives. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Afro-IP) Australia Major changes to Patents Act proposed; proposed changes anger Australian patent attorneys (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) (Managing Intellectual Property) IP examination centre in Melbourne to boost Australian innovation and jobs (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court: ‘Use it or lose it’ approach confirmed: E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Bulgaria M-Tel ‘best Bulgarian brand’ in… [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
The Ricci v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
Justice Scalia’s concurring opinion was joined by Justice Thomas. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
Post, at 6–7 (THOMAS, J., dissenting). [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am
The most politically experienced justice, ironically or not, is Clarence Thomas, who at least headed a reasonably important executive agency. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 10:38 am
As a quick review, it's important to note that DACA has two elements, as Chief Justice John Roberts explained in his opinion for the Supreme Court in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 1:58 am
Leonid V. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:38 pm
Thomas. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 1:58 am
Leonid V. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 8:25 pm
(Note: Bush v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
The current Supreme Court has at least two members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and two others, John Roberts and Samuel Alito who may also be receptive to originalist arguments. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:45 pm
Nken v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 5:36 am
In 2015 in Michigan v. [read post]
