Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE" Results 4981 - 5000 of 7,625
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2012, 12:54 am
Questions from the floor rounded off the proceedings, with proposals from the audience such as plant variety rights being handled by the PCC (apparently they are not?) [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm
Questions from the floor rounded off the proceedings, with proposals from the audience such as plant variety rights being handled by the PCC (apparently they are not?) [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am by Rob Robinson
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:44 am by Kiran Bhat
SCOTUSblog’s symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:08 am by Dale Carpenter
  The questions and answers received were as follows (note: percentages are rounded): QUESTION 1: “As a policy matter, do you think states should legalize same-sex marriages? [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:13 am by Rachel Sachs
Coverage also centers around the results of the Court’s decision this past Term in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here’s the final series of the initial round of 32: Match-up No. 13 (2) The Kansas Indians (72US737) — Tax case giving real-world life to the Worcester holding about state law v. (31) Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Arizona State Tax Commission defeats (22) United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 4:19 pm by Record on Appeal
Judge Ginoza issued a dissenting opinion in State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
As Conor noted in Friday’s round-up, a three-judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Arizona State Tax Commission (411US164) — No state tax on reservation income v. (22) United States v. [read post]