Search for: "Reproductive Rights" Results 4981 - 5000 of 8,488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2014, 6:58 am by Tracy Thomas
Some highlights on yesterday's Hobby Lobby case: SCOTUS Gets Hobby Lobby Horribly Wrong Several posts on Reproductive Rights Blog What Nuva Rings and Peyote Have in Common Today Why Today's Hobby Lobby Ruling Actually Hurts People of Faith Some of... [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:17 am by Jeremy
Under the auspices of ABC, WIPO also hosts the Trusted Intermediary Global Accessible Resources (TIGAR) book exchange, a database of over 238,000 accessible format books in 55 languages from libraries from around the world.The ABC includes the following umbrella organizations: World Blind Union, DAISY Consortium, International Authors' Forum, International Federation of Reproduction Rights Organizations, and the International Publishers Association".In an era in which we… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:47 am by Jessica Webb-Ayer
These preventive services include contraceptive methods and counseling—or more specifically, “all Food and Drug Administration approved contraceptive methods, sterilization procedures, and patient education and counseling for all women with reproductive capacity. [read post]
Everyone has the right to his or her religious beliefs, but those beliefs cannot be imposed on others. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 3:16 pm by Cicely Wilson
Coakley, US Supreme Court (6/26/14)Massachusetts amended its Reproductive Health Care Facilities Act to make it a crime to knowingly stand on a “public way or sidewalk” within 35 feet of an entrance or driveway to any “reproductive health care facility,” defined as “a place, other than within or upon the grounds of a hospital, where abortions are offered or performed. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:22 pm by Amy Howe
  Although the precise issues before the Court are different, both involve the intersection of the First Amendment (the McCullen plaintiffs’ desire to counsel women who might be seeking abortion and the Hobby Lobby families’ firm opposition to providing their female employees with birth control) and women’s reproductive rights. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 11:36 am by Kevin Goldberg
Under the Copyright Act, of course, the public performance right is held exclusively by the copyright holder – and everybody agreed that Aereo was not the copyright holder of any of the over-the-air programming it provided to subscribers. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:41 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
Kate Starr, a women’s rights activist and intern in Washington, D.C., reacts to the Supreme Court’s decision in McCullen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by tomwatts
As we move forward, we can probably expect to see states continuing to experiment and trying to find the right balance within the grey zone that exists between Hill and McCullen. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:21 pm
Its stated purpose is to “increase forthwith public safety at reproductive health care facilities. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:20 am
 The AG concluded that Member States may exclude reproduction devices from payment of levies when an objective justification exists. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:16 pm
The Act’s Transmit Clause defines that exclusive right as including the right to “transmit or otherwise communicate a performance . . . of the [copyrighted] work . . . to the public, by means of any device or process, whether the members of the public capable of receiving the performance . . . receive it in the same place or in separate places and at the same time or at different times. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:05 pm
But I do believe they reached the right result, because laws restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples are an example of unconstitutional sex discrimination. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:20 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  Respecting and promoting reproductive rights – including the right to make decisions concerning reproduction free of discrimination, coercion and violence, and access to comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services – must be integral to our efforts to end violence against indigenous women and girls. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:53 am
The Networks' complaint that Aereo is directly and secondarily liable for infringing their public-performance rights (Section 106(4)) and also their reproduction rights (Section 106(1)). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 am by Glenn
” (For example, publishers feel the royalty for reproductions in CDs and digital downloads, currently 9.1 cents, is a depressed rate compared to what publishers and songwriters could command on an open market.) [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:39 am
As discussed at the outset, Aereo’s secondary liability for performance infringement is yet to be determined, as is its primary and secondary liability for reproduction infringement. [read post]