Search for: "S. W., an individual" Results 4981 - 5000 of 11,733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2010, 10:24 am by Ashby Jones
Incorporation through the latter could have imbued individuals with a host of new rights. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:11 am by Anna Christensen
In this case, Justice Ginsburg joined "the Court's opinion to the extent it is consistent with" her concurrence, but "[w]ithout subscribing to the broader range of the Court's proximate cause analysis. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:22 pm by Charla Bizios Stevens
The questions to be asked in conducting the analysis follow: Is the work being performed by the individual an integral part of the employer’s business? [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:01 pm by David
Coetzee, the distinguished international philanthropist, Dr Irene W. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:45 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
The Department of Health and Human Services responded: the fact that a state law allows an individual to file [a civil action] to protect privacy does not conflict with the HIPAA penalty provisions (While the Department’s view is not binding, the Court noted that “[w]here an agency has authoritatively interpreted its own rule, courts generally defer to that reading unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 10:21 pm by Michael Atkins
On Nov. 12, 2009, the Eastern District of Virginia stayed the Virginia action pending the Western District’s ruling on Rosetta Stone’s motion. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:55 am
The court said that “[w]hile the result is harsh, it is one the law compels. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 10:39 am by Bill Marler
Before joining us, she served as a judicial clerk for Associate Chief Justice Charles W. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm by Nicki Milionis and Allana Smith
Ardent Leisure Limited (Ardent Leisure), Dreamworld’s parent company, was charged with three offences under section 32 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld) (Act), which provides that a person (including a body corporate) commits an offence if it has a health and safety duty, it fails to comply with that duty and in doing so it exposes an individual to a risk of death or serious injury or illness. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:54 pm by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
This screening happens even if the local prosecutor decides there’s no basis for a criminal charge. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 2:27 pm by The Silber Law Firm LLC
The poster moved to dismiss and sought damages under what is commonly called New York’s anti-SLAPP law. [read post]