Search for: "STATE v. STEVENS" Results 4981 - 5000 of 7,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2010, 2:58 pm
There are many resources in the Washington, D.C. area, on the Internet, and within the Georgetown Law Library for you to pursue research in the case United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:34 pm by David Lat
Steven Eggleston: plaintiff, lawyer, chiropractor.According to the complaint in Eggleston v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:32 am by lennyesq
Jobs, Apple’s chief executive, finally plans to make the iPhone available on Verizon Wireless, the largest wireless carrier in the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 1:52 pm
It is interesting to note that New Jersey's hate crime statute, as it then existed, was reviewed by the United States Supreme Court in the 2001 case of New Jersey v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Munro.Abingdon, Oxon, UK ; New York : Routledge, 2010.Constitutional LawK3161 .F73 2010Framing the state in times of transition : case studies in constitution making / Laurel E. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:11 am by Brian Evans
” – Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun, in a dissent in Callins v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm by Mark Litwak
Steven Spielberg et al., No. 08 Civ. 7810 United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:19 pm by Tom Lamb
This October 2010 New Jersey Trial Result Is In Stark Contrast To $3.2 Million Verdict In 2009 Montana Zometa Case (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) In early October 2010 the New Jersey state court jury which heard the evidence in the case of Bessemer v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:25 pm by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
In a recent interview, now-retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens told NPR that the one vote he regrets in his more than 35 years on the court was his vote in favor of reinstituting the death penalty in 1976 in Gregg v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
In 1936, the Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:43 pm by David
§ 48 after the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:51 pm by Anthony Lake
The article states that, since 1997, federal courts have determined that Department of Justice attorneys violated laws or ethical rules in some 201 cases, including the duty expressed by Supreme Court Justice George Sutherland over 70 years ago in Berger v. [read post]