Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 4981 - 5000
of 6,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2009, 10:31 am
The Court of Justice of the European Communities handed down its decision in Case C-385/07 P Der Grüne Punkt-Duales System Deutschland GmbH v European Commission, supported by Vfw AG, Landbell AG and BellandVision GmbH, nearly 26 months after the ruling of the Court of First Instance which this 198 paragraph decision upholds.For those whose memory may not instantly recall the decision of 24 May 2007 or the facts that led to it, let the IPKat recap ...The… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District… [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 1:21 pm
App. 579 (2009) (officers permitted to give lay opinion “based on personal knowledge of drug practices” that cocaine appeared to be packaged for sale, and the cash found on defendant indicated he was selling the drugs); State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:55 am
Corp. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Accordingly, the president’s subordinates were enjoined from implementing or giving effect to: Executive Order 13,836 Sections 5(a) 5(e), and 6; Executive Order 13,837 Sections 3(a), 4(a), and 4(b); and Executive Order 13,839 Sections 3, 4(a), and 4(c) (American Federation of Government Employees v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 2:37 pm
Sale of PHI The proposed regulations seek to implement Section 13405(d) of the HITECH Act regarding restrictions on the sale of PHI. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:22 am
Dickey, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Derivative suits, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:40 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
Piacentile v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals has explained the relationship between the two subsections as follows: The more that a claimed cost satisfies the business necessity requirement in subsection (c), the more the contractor’s burden to satisfy the benefit requirement in subsection (b) is reduced. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 2:16 pm
Supreme Court’s opinions in Ashcroft v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 2:16 pm
Supreme Court’s opinions in Ashcroft v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 1:30 pm
” State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
R. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 8:45 am
Abramović created limited edition photographs of this piece that she put on sale; while these photographs are protected under copyright law, and can do as she deems fit with them, the performance itself is not. [read post]
6 May 2006, 5:32 pm
Zatarain's, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:19 am
From McKenna v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:09 pm
Aug. 28, 2009)(Willett) (oil and gas law litigation, gas lost in transit, construction of contract re: sale, delivery) DYNEGY MIDSTREAM SERVICES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND VERSADO GAS PROCESSORS, LLC v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:04 pm
The patentee knew of the defendant's position in the market and the rapidly growing sales of the design-around product. [read post]
