Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 4981 - 5000
of 6,067
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2010, 2:09 pm
The trial court felt a co-owner needed protection from an “unscrupulous “owner who might “set up a bogus third party sale” and allow the sale to fall through to then force a partition sale for greater profits at the expense of the other owner’s desire not to sell. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
Erick C. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
Does a C&D letter do that? [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:06 am
(c) Gartenberg’s approach also reflects §36(b)’s place in the statutory scheme and, in particular, its relationship to the other protections the Act affords investors. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:45 am
Callaway Golf Company v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 10:32 am
Beret Sale! [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:19 am
Even so, there was ample evidence from which to conclude that Newzbin had so involved itself.On the question of whether Newzbin had communicated the claimants' Films to the public, Kitchin J found guidance in a European Court of Justice ruling in rather a different context, Case C-306/05 Sociedad General de Autores v Editores de España (SGAE) v Rafael Hoteles SA. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:56 am
Bury Metropolitan Borough Council v Gibbons [2010] EWCA Civ 327 This was the Court of Appeal judgment on a second appeal from a s.204 Housing Act 1996 appeal in the County Court. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 11:30 pm
(See 19 C. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am
Maruti Udyog Ltd. 20% c. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 2:34 pm
Pajares v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:25 am
By Eric Goldman The European Court of Justice issued its long-anticipated decision in the three Google AdWords cases (C-236/08, C-237-08 and C-238/08) referred to it by the French Cour de Cassation. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:50 am
by Roger Alford The Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
Hot off the press, the IPKat brings you news of this morning's ruling in Joined Cases C-236, 237 and 238/08 Google France, Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier; Google France v Viaticum Luteciel; Google France v CNRRH Pierre? [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:02 pm
[emphasis added] We strongly agree with the NFA’s current leverage requirements. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 5:09 pm
He may or may not anticipate an ultimate profit from the sale of his interest, but he normally draws very little from the corporation as dividends. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:12 pm
c. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
So begins the opinion in last week's Primiano v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 10:27 am
Due to the failing economy and lagging sales and in a desperate attempt to save his company, the Effervescent owner Julius C. [read post]
