Search for: "Session v. State"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 6,592
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
Uncorrected evidence from the 14 November 2011 (PDF): session has now been published. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am
(5) A discussion of specific policy recommendations to deter the activities of notorious foreign infringers and encourage foreign businesses industry norms that promote the protection of intellectual property globally, including addressing— (A) whether notorious foreign infringers that engage in significant infringing should be prohibited by the laws of the States from seeking to raise capital United States, including offering stock to the public; and (B) whether the… [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
(Ilya Somin) Virginia was one of several states that enacted a strong eminent domain reform law after the Supreme Court ruled in Kelo v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 8:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
Willingboro Mall, Ltd. v. 240/242 Franklin Avenue, L.L.C. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:30 am
Then, in a true illustration of the state of mind of the guy who won’t pay the two dollars, the dealer and his lawyer removed the case from small claims to regular court. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
New York regulation requires that all CLE sessions must be conducted by a JD or an attorney in good standing. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:43 am
Jackson v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Admittedly the Justice case recently experienced a vogue of attention in the United States, particularly among lawyers looking for possible precedents for bringing charges against the authors of the “torture memos” in Bush’s Justice Department.[4] But even this brief renaissance of interest quickly waned as the precedential relevance of the Justice appeared smaller than hoped.[5] The fact that the NMT program has long been treated as nothing more than a footnote to the IMT… [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:31 pm
No Intention to Expand or Contract Existing Authority The amended version does have new language expressly stating that the section should not be read to expand or limit “the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:38 pm
Cain and last session's ruling in Connick v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court to hear an appeal in Armour v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
Kammen invoked Witherspoon v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 7:49 am
"Similar language regarding the votes of the "members elected to each house" appears in Article IV, section 6, pertaining to legislative sessions; Article V, section 6, pertaining to overriding vetoes; Article VI, section 7 pertaining to the selection of judges; Article VII, section 1, pertaining to special acts for localities; Article IX, section 1, pertaining to changing the number of State Corporation Commissioners; Article X, section 9, pertaining to… [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
At those sessions, 19 of the 26 listed witnesses were investors, entrepreneurs, industry consultants, trade group officials or patients who said that agency delays in approving a device had harmed them or a loved one. [read post]
