Search for: "State v. Browning"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 8,737
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
STATE OF TEXAS; from Bexar County; 7th district (07-07-00274-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-28-07)08-0058 TAMMY ELKINS v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
After the Supreme Court announced the rule of de novo review in Brown v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 12:07 pm
The lawsuit, Sevick v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
At the Huffington Post, Jelena Hasbrouck suggests that if Perry v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:38 am
Judge Janice Rogers Brown dissented from the ruling, arguing that FERC does not have the authority to take action to reduce the greenhouse gas impact of pipelines it approves, and thus is not obligated to analyze some impacts, stating “[t]he truth is that FERC has no control over whether the power plants that will emit these greenhouse gases will come into existence or remain in operation” (Sierra Club et al. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:10 pm
DauscherToday, the California Court of Appeal held in Brown v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:50 pm
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong dismissed the federal claims and remanded the others to state court. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 10:08 pm
DL v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & [*2]Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 303 [2001]). [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
Brown v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 10:01 am
In October 2019, the House of Commons Justice Committee published its report “Court and Tribunal reforms“[5] on the modernization programme and stated: “Courts service modernization, including the use of better IT to be more efficient, is long overdue”. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
In light of the obvious provenance of section 4 in Flood (the explanatory notes of the Act state expressly (para 29) that “The intention in this provision is to reflect the existing common law as most recently set out in Flood v Times Newspapers”), it seems very likely that the section would be interpreted as importing in an obligation of responsibility on the part of the defendant, even though it does not state this expressly. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:48 pm
The change, to s.37 of FOIA, was inserted into the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 in the dying days of Gordon Brown’s premiership. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 6:20 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Lester Smith v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm
On 20-24 June 2022, there will be a trial in the case of Robert Lee v Vanessa Brown before Collins Rice J On 22 June 2022, there will be an application in Koutrouchi v Currie Appeal before Johnson J On 23-24 June 2022, there will be applications in Piepenbrock v LSE before Heather Williams J. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 11:12 am
Norfolk Southern Railway (Nov. 8): Whether the Constitution’s due process clause bars a state from requiring a corporation to consent to personal jurisdiction as a condition of doing business in the state. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:57 am
From Doe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 12:04 pm
Brown, 5095, 5757/06, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 312; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 9:02 am
Tax law professor Dorothy Brown commented: “Here’s another example of NYT tax reporting ignoring race. [read post]
