Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 4981 - 5000
of 13,582
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2016, 8:53 am
From Keyes v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am
However, the judgment in Lukaszewski & Ors, R (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20, handed down by the Supreme Court last week, appears to offer a ray of hope to applicants facing short time limits. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
C. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:04 am
It said that “[c]reation of the office by statute is a guide and not the sine qua non of whether a civil service position is independent. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:19 am
In United States Patent And Trademark Office, Et Al., v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:19 am
In United States Patent And Trademark Office, Et Al., v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:05 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:47 pm
Supreme Court rules on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
In a recent case, Salvador v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
” 42 PA C S sec. 9799 In Coppolino v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 3:00 am
Dalton v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 6:57 am
Partnership v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
Probationary employee challenging his or her termination must show bad faith or an improper or impermissible reason underlies the terminationMatter of Mathis v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 2011 NY Slip Op 01190, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentProbationary correction officer Demar Mathis filed an Article 78 petition challenging his termination from his employment for “failure to complete his probationary period in a satisfactory manner. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm
R. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 10:18 am
§154(b)(1)(A)-(C). [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:34 pm
In today’s case (Peacock v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 11:25 am
The Law Office of John C. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:54 am
The quotes come directly from the three major fair dealing decisions: CCH Canadian, Access Copyright, and SOCAN v. [read post]
