Search for: "State v. Childs"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 18,882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2018, 2:25 am
(3) Is a member state entitled to inquire, before recognising a child who is not the consanguineous descendant of the EEA national as a direct descendant under art 2.2(c) into whether the procedures for placing the child in the guardianship or custody of that EEA national was such as to give sufficient consideration to the best interests of that child? [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 6:48 am
State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm
That point came and went in the Roscommon case–just as it did in Z v United Kingdom–without an appropriate response from child protection services. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Steinman noted in his July 1, 2013 decision in N.S. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 4:00 am
Freshour v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:15 pm
It is true that the CRC at Article 37(a) requires that states parties ensure that:No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 9:41 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Erron Goss v. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 5:02 pm
HL (A Minor) v Facebook Incorporated, The Northern Health and Social Care Trust, The Department of Justice for Northern Ireland and others [2013] NIQB 25. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Until it does, I believe that the existing case law holding that an abatement of an existing child support order is not warranted due to incarceration of one of the parties, see Ross v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:52 pm
Over at The WSJ Law Blog, there's a nice profile of Richard Diaz, the Florida solo who represents Michael Williams, a defendant who is challenging the constitutionality of a federal child-pornography statute in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:27 am
The Court can review a case at the behest of the government employee who lost on the merits but won on qualified immunity, but this case is moot.United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:08 pm
California state law does not permit recovery by a child for loss of consortium. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 12:39 pm
C. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:53 am
AC34385 - State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:27 pm
Unfortunately, the state Department of Health reports that Florida is No. 1 when it comes to unintentional child drowning. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:05 am
" The court recognized that there was no Georgia case law on point, but cited to United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 11:30 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 5:42 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC19197 - State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 10:56 am
The Court of Appeals upholds the law and dismisses the case.The case is Phillips v. [read post]
