Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 29,289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2011, 3:18 pm
State Bd. of Pharmacy v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:05 am
" Gowland v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Moreover, under United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 10:45 am
NSAACLU v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:00 am
District Court in Synar v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Authority of an employer to prohibit an employee's legal use of marijuana as permitted by state lawLance Carlson v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Authority of an employer to prohibit an employee's legal use of marijuana as permitted by state lawLance Carlson v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 12:58 am
Johnson was admitted to practice law in 1760, and attended both the first and second meetings of the Continental Congress. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am
Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:30 am
The Press explains:On March 8, 1971, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a case, Griggs v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Forty-nine years after Roe, 24 states joined briefs in Dobbs criticizing the decision; 228 members of Congress supported briefs asking that the question of abortion be returned to the states (236 wanted the decision in Roe to be left in place); and, fed by increasingly strident rhetoric on both sides, opinion was arguably even more divided over abortion than when the Court decided Roe.The hope that a single Supreme Court decision like Roe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:41 am
This Court and the court of appeals also have held, in light of Congress’s decision to geographically limit the scope of patent rights and infringement liability to the United States, that a lawful sale abroad does not automatically confer unlimited “authority” to sell or import a patented article in the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:52 am
The petition of the day is: Title: Stern v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:43 am
And the absence of deference on the Article III question is bolstered by the Supreme Court's far-more-formalistic approach to departures from Article III, as typified by Chief Justice Roberts's opinion for the majority in Stern v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:20 am
Pliva v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
F5 Capital v Pappas, No. 16-530 (2d Cir. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:35 pm
Justice Samuel Alito wrote the opinion for the Court stating, “Not only does petitioners’ argument push the term ‘pending’ far beyond the breaking point, but it would lead to strange results that Congress is unlikely to have wanted. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:57 am
Lost in the anger over yesterday's opinion in Golan was the Court's brief unanimous opinion in Mims v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:10 pm
The case, US v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am
Davis, courts must intervene to strike down state laws that unduly burden interstate commerce because otherwise, we might end up waiting “for decades until Congress can act. [read post]
