Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 4981 - 5000 of 9,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm by John Floyd
The prosecutor accountability site says misconduct occurs between two sets of rules: first, “the legal rules that bind prosecutors so as to ensure due process – the state and federal constitution, statutory law, rules of criminal procedure, judicial orders, and the like;” and “the ethical standards of the legal profession as expressed in each state’s bar rules of professional responsibility and similar professional codes. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Mark Walsh
Benisek (Art Lien) “For the first time ever,” she says, “this court refuses to remedy a constitutional violation because it thinks the task beyond judicial capabilities. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Jordan Brunner
District Court granted Xiaomi a preliminary injunction against their designation. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:42 am
*  Concluding that the First Amendment claimed by Doninger was not clearly established, the Second Circuit affirmed Federal District court's decision that administrators were entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:34 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
  The Third Appellate District addressed this issue in a recent decision involving a statutorily mandated EIR prepared by the state Department of Conservation (“Department”) concerning fracking. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:13 pm by Luke Goodrich
Which path the court takes will have profound implications for the relationship between church and state. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
The court also noted the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 2:56 pm
That’s the ultimate question in the Z Street litigation; yesterday, the district court rejected some of the government’s preliminary procedural objections, and allowed the case to go forward (Z Street v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:48 am
  In the case of Novartis v Noven (Federal Circuit 2017), two district courts found the patent to not be invalid, whereas the PTAB later found it invalid, quoting Supreme Court case law that the “different evidentiary burdens mean that the possibility of inconsistent results in inherent to Congress’ regulatory design”. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
Katfriend Axel Ferrazzini writes about the recent decision of the Higher District Court (Oberlandesgericht) of Düsseldorf in Unwired Planet v Huawei (22 March 2019, Case-No. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am by Kirk Jenkins
  In our first installment, we reviewed the Supreme Court’s decision in American Banana Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am by Kirk Jenkins
  In our first installment, we reviewed the Supreme Court’s decision in American Banana Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am by Kirk Jenkins
  In our first installment, we reviewed the Supreme Court’s decision in American Banana Co. v. [read post]