Search for: "State v. Husband"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 7,038
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:09 am
Mattos v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:45 am
“This is something that could be powerful,” said Abhijit V. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:30 am
” Riley v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:12 am
In Schiffer v Schiffer, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4790060 (N.Y.Sup.) plaintiff husband moved for an order directing that summary judgment be granted in his favor of divorce under Domestic Relations Law 170 (7). [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:19 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:22 am
In Schiffer v Schiffer, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4790060 (N.Y.Sup.) plaintiff husband moved for an order directing that summary judgment be granted in his favor of divorce under Domestic Relations Law 170 (7). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
But the facts can be used to dispute state witnesses. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 8:37 am
Lollie v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:17 am
In Rowe v Vargason, 2011 WL 4529341 (D. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:06 am
This is probably best expressed in People v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:42 am
Bond Topple Missouri V. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
His story is told through a lawsuit to which he was party, the landmark United States Supreme Court decision Hamdan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:00 pm
In State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 5:33 am
It happened in yesterday’s 8th District decision in State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:10 am
The case is Florence v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:34 pm
She and her husband conceived another child five months later and eventually gave birth to a healthy baby. [read post]
