Search for: "State v. Thomas"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 13,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the sentencing guidelines is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:59 am
In the majority opinion in Murthy v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm
Why didn't Justice Scalia join Clarence Thomas' strong originalist dissent? [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:44 am
In Teed v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:05 pm
Department of Labor v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:50 pm
United States Docket Filing | Questions Presented Case Number: 07-10441 On Appeal From: USCA-3 Date Argued: January 21, 2009 Date Decided: April 6, 2009 5-4; Vacated and Remanded Majority: Souter(m), Stevens, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer Dissent: Alito(d), Roberts, Scalia, Thomas Days between argument and opinion: 75 (42) United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 8:55 am
More on Batson v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:25 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued its ruling in North Carolina Department of Corrections v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
United States cases and its more recent plurality opinion in Chavez v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:22 am
 The issue in Barber, et al., v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:52 am
Supreme Court held today in Buck v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:47 am
As many of you no doubt have heard, the United States Supreme Court last week decided that FDA regulations applicable to generic drug manufacturers preempt state law "failure to warn" claims in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:46 pm
FEC, and it upheld the disclosure requirements 8–1 (Thomas dissenting). [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:15 am
” And then there’s New York v. [read post]
See(2)(A) You Later: Supreme Court Holds that DOJ Has Broad Dismissal Authority Even After Unsealing
21 Jun 2023, 9:59 am
Polansky v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:01 pm
Expense Bd. v. [read post]