Search for: "Styles v. State" Results 4981 - 5000 of 5,645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2010, 8:28 am by Charles Kotuby
The Supreme Court of the United States heard argument in Abbott v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
Nueva Generacion Music Group, Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court C D California: BitTorrent site liable for Grokster style inducement of copyright infringement: Columbia Pictures v Fung (Internet law - Internet Cases) District Court N D California rejects RealNetworks’ claim that movie studios were colluding against it (Ars Technica)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps EMI - EMI attacks NirGaga mashup (Electronic Frontier Foundation)… [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:51 am by Beck, et al.
(referring to the state’s adoption of Canterbury v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 8:18 am by Steve Hall
He even grew a Hitler-style mustache, carried a copy of Hitler's book, ''Mein Kampf'' during the proceedings and gave the Nazi salute to the jury. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm by Richard Roane
On January 5, 2010, the Michigan Court of Appeals heard oral argument in the matter of Rose v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:29 am by Simon Fodden
District Court for the Northern District of California (USDCCAND) in a case styled Perry v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:46 am
Ones to Watch for 2010: The AmeriKat will be keeping her eyes and whiskers out for the exciting IP stories of 2010 including updates on the bubbling-under of the malevolent ACTA (here and here), the ping-pong saga of Nokia v Apple (here and here), i4i v Microsoft, and the international copyright consequences Premier League v You Tube (and here). [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 9:08 pm
Representations regarding the relationship between the holding company being transferred by the ultimate foreign entity and the PRC resident enterprise, in terms of “capital, operation, sales and purchases;” v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am by Ray Mullman
  That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]