Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE" Results 4981 - 5000 of 6,105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2010, 10:13 pm by Barry Eagar
I wonder if IPAustralia will do the same...Facebook | United States Patent and Trademark Office [read post]
20 May 2010, 2:50 pm by nipper
Per the press release: USPTO Launches Page on Facebook Agency’s profile will deliver the latest news, photos and videos from the USPTO Washington – The Department of Commerce’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today launched its official page on Facebook. [read post]
20 May 2010, 1:08 pm by Gene Quinn
The United States Patent and Trademark Office today announced two news items relative to its efforts to expand international work sharing arrangements. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:08 pm by Gene Quinn
It seems pretty clear that under the direction of David Kappos the United States Patent and Trademark Office is pursuing an “all of the above” strategy to cutting into the backlog and ultimately reducing the pendency of patent applications. [read post]
19 May 2010, 2:10 am by John L. Welch
What role should the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s rules play in defining materiality? [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:57 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Chrysler further states in the complaint that although not related to the ‘395 patent, the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:04 pm
Inequitable Conduct To prove inequitable conduct, Hyundai must provide clear and convincing evidence of (1) affirmative misrepresentations of a material fact, failure to disclose material information, or submission of false material information and (2) an intent to deceive the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO"). [read post]
18 May 2010, 11:12 am by Timothy J. Maier
--The Director shall have authority to set or adjust by rule any fee established or charged by the Office under sections 41 and 376 of title 35, United States Code, or under section 31 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1113), or any other fee established or charged by the Office under any other provision of law, notwithstanding the fee amounts established or charged thereunder, for the filing or processing of any submission to, and for all other… [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:33 am by Jake Ward
Per this press release yesterday at the USPTO: USPTO Opens Application Exchange Program to All Applicants to Reduce Patent Backlog “Project Exchange” Expanded and Extended to Enable All Applicants to Expedite Processing of a Pending Application in Exchange for Withdrawal of an Unexamined Pending Application WASHINGTON – The Commerce Department’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today announced the… [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Dustcontrol International (EPLAW)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): Infringement action won't be stayed pending foreign decision in non-patent claim: Elmotech Ltd & Anor v Guidance Ltd & Anor (PatLit)   United States US General Director Kappos testimony to Congress (Patently-O) Judge Michel: USPTO should receive $1 billion infusion of cash (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) The US Reporting on IPRs - the Watch List (IP tango)… [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:18 pm by Gene Quinn
UPDATED: 5/17/2010 at 6:36 pm The United States Patent and Trademark Office today announced the expansion to all applicants a “Project Exchange” program. [read post]
16 May 2010, 7:41 pm by IP Dragon
"The United States notes that at times particular enforcement actions are directed not only at copyright or trademark infringement, but also include infringement activities that may be considered more serious under the Chinese legal system. [read post]
16 May 2010, 1:24 pm by Morris Turek
  Not unlike many other clients, he informed me that he had already conducted a search of his mark using the search tool provided by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on its website (www.uspto.gov) and that he fortunately “didn’t find anything. [read post]
15 May 2010, 2:22 pm
Following a bench trial, the district court concluded that Taltech inventor John Wong engaged in inequitable conduct during prosecution of the '779 patent before the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") when he did not disclose a raincoat seam that included heat-fusible adhesive tape (undisclosed raincoat seam, "URS"), and when he misrepresented a raincoat seam previously made and sold by TAL… [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:09 pm by Jim Pravel
Michel is the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC"). [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:09 pm by Jim Pravel
Michel is the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC"). [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:07 pm by Gene Quinn
Earlier this week i4i Limited Partnership announced that the United States Patent and Trademark Office confirmed the patentability of all claims of the U.S. [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:50 am
  However, unlike with their more tangible commercial cousins, the United States Patent and Trademark Office and Federal Courts have struggled with affording comparable protection. [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:50 am
  However, unlike with their more tangible commercial cousins, the United States Patent and Trademark Office and Federal Courts have struggled with affording comparable protection. [read post]