Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 4981 - 5000 of 7,906
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-5271, for yesterday’s grant in McQuiggin v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 7:24 pm
The Court contrasted the parade organizers with cable operators who were the subject of Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Protection in the United States of Foreign Trademarks That Are Well Known But Not Used There, 98 TMR 1379 (November - December 2008).Bukhara Grill, NYCAmicus Brief of the International Trademark Association in Starbucks Corporation v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:35 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge John Koeltl ruled last Friday in Jonathan Tasini v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:14 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In its 21-page opinion in Spirit Airlines, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:14 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In its 21-page opinion in Spirit Airlines, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:43 am
The debt collector, National Credit Systems Inc., had tacked on charges for "attorney's fees," but couldn't explain where the charges came from. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 6:38 am by Ellena Erskine
Garland, the dispute over a law that would ban TikTok in the United States on national security grounds if its parent company, ByteDance, doesn’t sell the app by Jan. 19. [read post]
29 May 2007, 5:10 am
The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decided last year in Holder v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 2:00 pm
So Blawgletter paid attention to the Ninth Circuit's opinion (here) in Af-Cap, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 7:24 am by Dan Farber
In South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 9:55 am by John Jascob
Cain explained that even though the FCPA unit is specialized, consisting of about 40 people, the unit will handle the non-FCPA aspects, because it doesn’t make sense to break up the case. [read post]