Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 6,766
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2012, 7:12 am
Deegan, 251 N.Y. 467 (1929) to settle on a doctrine essentially similar to Wickard v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:58 pm
The Court then used the factors from R. v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
Though the plan created districts roughly equal in total population, the appellants contend that it nevertheless contains “gross disparities in voters or potential voters,” and thereby runs afoul of the Fourteenth Amendment’s “one person, one vote” principle under Reynolds v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:48 pm
Likewise, a broad decision recognizing a constitutional right to same-sex marriage could energize socially conservative voters. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:30 pm
Simplifying, a third-party candidate for governor can get on the ballot upon collecting signatures from 1% of registered voters; a third-party candidate for the U.S. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:30 pm
The Court rejected Sprint’s reliance on Preston v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
Moreover, just as New Labour adopted the mantra of “tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime” to attract voters from the Conservatives in the 1990s, Teresa May’s overtures can be seen as poaching voters long swayed by the Labour Party’s traditional concern civil liberties. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:10 pm
The first step in the case of Louisiana v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:25 am
In a world with little or no moving costs, foot voting for freedom would be even more common.To be sure, few of these foot voters are ideological libertarians. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:38 am
In a future article I’ll discuss E2E-verifiable, methods by which each voter can trace his or her own ballot through the process to gain assurance that has been recorded and counted correctly. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 10:52 am
” Jack explained how the Supreme Court’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 1:23 pm
And this seems consistent with Florida Star v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:54 am
" Patterson v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:00 am
That speech is entirely protected under the First Amendment and governing case law, including Brandenburg v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 9:35 am
Missouri V. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
Doe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
What many of those legislators and advocates want to try is exactly what Arizona voters opted to try in 1998 — and what the 5-4 decision on Monday explicitly found unconstitutional in the case of Arizona Free Enterprise Club v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:24 pm
See NLRB v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 6:44 am
Further, the court concluded that the employer failed to show that threats, electioneering, and name-calling by nonparty employees precluded the holding of a fair election or disadvantaged the employer (NLRB v. [read post]
