Search for: "Williams v. United States" Results 4981 - 5000 of 6,565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
 Perhaps unsurprisingly, in the case the United States filed an amicus brief noting all of that and arguing in favor of Ms. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:15 pm by Gary Neustadter
(The Ninth Circuit BAP held state specific bankruptcy exemptions constitutional in Applebaum v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
There is a rather fey textual argument I have heard that runs like this: Of course you can disqualify someone who is not a civil officer of the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:35 pm by William W. Abbott
  First, the fee included the estimated cost of lands which were given to the City by the United States Navy. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It was a huge setback for efforts to dismantle the ongoing privilege of whiteness in the United States and is symptomatic of resistance among movement conservatives on and off the Court to efforts to build a more inclusive society.In both respects, Students for Fair Admissions is a deeply undemocratic decision. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
IPSO 11191-21 Sharif v The Jewish Chronicle, 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 11103-22 A woman v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 10895-22 Various v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 10780-22 Raeburn v southwalesguardian, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication… [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The roadmap expressly states it is not a guide to future compliance, but rather an information document setting out Ofcom’s present thinking. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 7:31 am
In the United States, judges have been less attached to such grand garb. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:32 am by Steve Hall
Who would have ever imagined that in the United States, basic fundamental fairness would be so cloaked in elusiveness? [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:03 am by Scott Bomboy
The proposed amendment repealed the 23rd Amendment and gave the federal District two United States Senators and a representative in the House. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
The Constitution states that members of Congress—along with every state legislative official and every judicial and executive official of both the state and federal governments—“shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:51 am by Jonathan Witmer-Rich
  The first court decision discussing a delayed notice search warrant—that is to say, a covert search actually authorized in advance by a magistrate—is United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]