Search for: "50 Doe Defendants" Results 5001 - 5020 of 7,317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Court didn’t afford the rebuttable presumption of distinctiveness; had post-sale confusion survey of over 90%; over 50% of those identified the red sole as the reason they thought the shoe was a Louboutin. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:46 am
Res ipsa loquitur creates "[a] rebuttable presumption or inference that the defendant was negligent, which arises upon proof that the instrumentality or condition causing the injury was in the defendant's exclusive control and that the accident was one that ordinarily does not occur in the absence of Negligence. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by admin
Honestly, does this building give you a sense of optimism? [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:54 am by Steve Lombardi
In addition, the jury assessed punitive damages against the two defendants. ? [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
 Under the Labor Code § 226(e), an employee is entitled to recover the greater of all actual damages or $50 for an initial violation and $100 for each subsequent violation, up to a maximum penalty of $4,000. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 3:58 am by Russ Bensing
So what the opinion does is use a different standard of review:  contrary to law. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
    In the following guest post, Jonathan Joseph (pictured to the left) takes a look at the extent to officers may defend themselves in reliance on the business judgment rule in cases to which California law applies. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 1:43 pm by Louis Leichter
 A physician takes a position with a clinic, whose clientele are at least 50% chronic pain patients. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
Plus, a product liability plaintiff does not have to prove liability of a corporate defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:11 am by PaulKostro
Specifically, the Court noted that “nominal” has often been characterized as amounts of $25 or $50. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
However, in many cases, the injury actually does not arise until the moment when the child is born. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 10:51 am by Neha Sareen
A $50 million dollar civil action suit has been filed in the Queens Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:16 am by Connie Gibilaro
We will vehemently defend any allegations to the contrary. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:57 pm
The Court ruled that the defendant’s sentence should not be reduced, but that in fact, it should be capped at 50 years. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:58 am by Joel R. Brandes
Plaintiff Steven Simkin (husband) and defendant Laura Blank (wife) married in 1973 and had two children. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:31 pm
The defendants have also argued that the class action does not fit the commonality requirement due to the fact that, if the plaintiffs were to succeed in court, the defendants would have to sort through each case individually to determine the exact amount due to each employee which would require an unreasonable amount of time and effort. [read post]