Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS "
Results 5001 - 5020
of 95,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2019, 6:48 am
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 1:00 pm
.) -- concluding that: (1) plaintiff’s lawsuit seeking access to refugee resettlement application was not moot, because: (a) disclosure of some records by non-party Department of State in response to plaintiff’s separate request did not settle whether USCIS conducted adequate search; (b) plaintiff adequately pleaded a policy-or-practice claim regarding USCIS’s alleged refusal to search a database for refugee resettlement documents; and (2) granting… [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 11:38 am
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 10:17 am
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:39 pm
We all know that when a plaintiff voluntarily dismisses in that situation, the trial court retains jurisdiction to award attorneys' fees. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 11:57 am
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 11:22 pm
Instead, the defendant should only be held liable, if at all, for any alleged injury attributable to the fall from the ladder. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 10:36 am
The court granted defendant's motion to strike plaintiff's damages expert's reports and rejected plaintiff's argument that its expert relied on the 25% rule of thumb as an alternative method to calculate reasonable royalty damages. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 7:05 am
Delaware law, however, explicitly provides that '[a] settlement agreement is enforceable if it contains all essential terms, even though it expressly leaves other matters for future negotiation.'" CallWave Communication LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:11 am
Summaries of all opinions issued since April 2015 available here. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:03 pm
DHS (D.D.C.) -- determining that: (1) DHS demonstrated that it did not maintain records concerning plaintiff's application for "diplomatic status" card; (2) plaintiff failed to appeal CIA's Glomar response regarding himself, and his request concerning "Russia" and the "Cold War" was not reasonably described; and (3) National Security Administration and the General Services Administration demonstrated that it never received requests… [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
.), the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas granted in part and denied in part a Plaintiff's motion to compel relative to requested additional discovery responses from, and a supplemental deposition of, a defendant doctor.In this case, the Plaintiff attempted to secure the additional deposition of the doctor after the Plaintiff had certified the case for trial under a certification that all discovery had been completed. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:08 am
We agree with the defendant on all three claims and reverse the judgment of the trial court. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 11:00 pm
Lastly, the appellate court reiterated that, in any event, the parties all agreed that the events described in the allegedly altered portion of the doctor’s office notes never happened. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:00 am
[D]etermining the truth or falsity of Defendants’ alleged defamatory statements—where the content of those statements concerns whether Plaintiffs complied with [Diamond Hill Baptist Church's] practices—would require us to interpret or weigh ecclesiastical matters, an inquiry not permitted by the First Amendment....We affirm the trial court’s order on the ground that all statements Plaintiffs challenge are barred by the ecclesiastical… [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:16 am
"At a high level, all four claims undoubtedly involve the idea of superimposition of images. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 12:30 am
In early April 2020, the court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissed all eleven counts of their complaint. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:19 am
The court granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction requiring defendants to withdraw their petitions to the PTAB seeking to invalidate plaintiff's patents-in-suit because plaintiff established a likelihood of success on the merits of its related breach of contract claim. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:41 am
Following an inter partes review that found all asserted claims of the patents-in-suit unpatentable or invalid, the court denied defendant's motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
(Interesting, the plaintiff was not required to show that the family was aware of its claims when the conveyance occurred.)Given those underpinnings, the AD1 thought that the court below had “providently exercised its discretion” when it issued injunctive relief in the plaintiff’s favor.We convey our condolences to all concerned …. [read post]
