Search for: "Black v. Black" Results 5001 - 5020 of 12,720
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am by Dale Carpenter
Businesses can't claim constitutional protection for a categorical rule that they won't sell commissioned products to gays, Jews, Blacks, or women. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
These private citizens and citizens' groups include Michigan Decency Action Council, Inc., Judy Rose, Dar Vander Ark, and Black Hills Citizens for a Better Community (collectively "Non-City Defendants-Appellees"). [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:20 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The Article’s Part IV looks at the political reality of how the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 7:29 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
At first it was implied, but then Justice Hugo Black laid it out in black and white in the 1952 opinion in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 11:45 am by Mike Rappaport
Perhaps it did so because it wanted to confer special benefits to blacks in the near future. [read post]