Search for: "Black v. State"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 9,182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2022, 7:36 am
Supreme Court, in Shinn v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:26 am
” Conners v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:31 am
” Wyoming v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:56 am
State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
Jerry Black (listen to the livestream at 3pm CT!). [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:02 am
The case involves the application of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to redistricting of a state legislative seat in North Carolinia, where blacks made up just under 40 percent of the voting age population in the district. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court already removed one such guardrail in Trump v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:57 am
ACSblog discusses the split among state courts about how to interpret the Court’s ruling last Term in Caperton v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981) with Belton's practically black-letter rule allowing the search of cars of arrested persons, and which, post-Gant, erodes police motivation to make pretextual car stops under Atwater v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:03 pm
This measure did more than Supreme Court rulings, like Brown v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
.'"] From the Florida Court of Appeal's decision yesterday in CNN, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:04 am
In light of the Supreme Court's rulings in Gall and Kimbrough, which had come down in the interim, the majority held in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
This may be a hangry rant, but the AmeriKat is left searching for the justice of a telelogical approach amongst the black and white interpretation of the drafting of the SPC Regulation in this decision. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:47 am
In State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 am
Hamdi v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 10:05 am
I suspect Minnesota judges will not tolerate this type of conduct and correctly determine that the state has not provided the source code to drivers under the Minnesota Supreme Court ruling of State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 11:52 am
Robinsons' letter of 21st February stated that the product would be a replica of the 1997 version of Henry, and repeated its request that Numatic state whether any rights in or relating to Henry would be infringed. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 9:12 am
"Let the stupidity begin...The Separate But Equal Act was set forth in Marbury v. [read post]
