Search for: "Born v. Born"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 7,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2009, 9:01 am
Supreme Court was Gilman v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's grant of Summary Judgment in James v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:15 am
Years later, that Supreme Court decision, Korematsu v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
This duty could be extrapolated from Williams v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 1:56 am
Supreme Court was Gilman v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:59 am
Gosbee v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 3:18 am
In Farah v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:57 pm
That provision thus allowed the national court to order the air carrier to compensate damage arising, for passengers, from breach of the contract of carriage by air on a legal basis other than Regulation 261/2004, that was to say, in particular, in the conditions provided for by the Montreal Convention and national law (see also: Case C‑83/10 Sousa Rodríguez and Others [2011]).The referring courts also asked whether Arts 5 to 7 of Regulation 261/2004, as interpreted by Sturgeon… [read post]
24 May 2015, 6:54 pm
MacCormack v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
They had a soon together, Luca Andrea, who was born in 1970.The IPKat has already reported on a case brought jointly by Luca Andrea Dotti and Audrey Hepburn's other son, Sean Hepburn Ferrer, and decided by the Court of First Instance of Milan in 2015 concerning unauthorized evocation (not even direct use) of the likeness of Audrey Hepburn in an advertisement. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 3:30 am
A notable exception was the Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 1:26 pm
The most notorious of these cases was Nancy S. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 12:30 am
may have facilitated the determination of the commercial origin of the candy in question was not at odds with the fact that it may not have altered the distinctive character of the three-dimensional mark consisting of the shape or the appearance of those goods for the purposes of point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) EUTMR.While it was true that, in the event of joint use of a three-dimensional mark with another mark, it may be easier to establish the alteration of the distinctive… [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
PollvogtThis is the final post in the Symposiumon Unconstitutional Animus.While the constitutional concept of animus was born in a case about discrimination against hippies, and was significantly elaborated in a case about persons with cognitive disabilities, since the Court’s 1996 decision in Romer v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:59 am
From Monday’s decision in Doe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 6:20 am
If there is a place in the world to come for iconic copyright disputes, then surely the 1990’s Israeli case of Kimron v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:09 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:02 pm
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the Michigan district court's ruling in Keith v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
His discussion of NAACP v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
At the time this decision was rendered, the court was applying Askey v. [read post]
