Search for: "California v. Law" Results 5001 - 5020 of 33,825
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2015, 7:07 am by Jason Rantanen
Lefstin, Professor of Law at the University of California, Hastings College of Law. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Jon Ibanez
The California Supreme Court held in Ingersoll v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:18 pm by DMLP Staff
Frey also filed a special motion to dismiss the state law claims under California's anti-SLAPP law. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:55 pm by Rafael Reyneri
In a complaint filed on Monday involving an alleged data breach, Barnes v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:51 am by Steven G. Pearl
The California Supreme Court yesterday granted review in Lamps Plus Overtime Cases (5/10/11) pending its decision in Brinker v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:15 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Hypertouch brought claims under California law (California Business and Professions Code § 17529.5(a)) but did not meet the heightened pleading standard of Rule 9. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 4:03 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
The majority also rejected the plaintiffs’ contention that the at-issue arbitration clause is unconscionable under California law. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 2:52 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  In that symposium, I found the contribution by Professor Zach Price of the University of California at Hastings Law School to be particularly worthwhile. [read post]