Search for: "Caming v. United States" Results 5001 - 5020 of 9,170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2014, 11:22 am by Giles Peaker
Then along came Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor (No 2) [2014] UKSC 46 on 23 July. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
The University of Michigan moves to dismiss this claim, arguing that, as a Michigan state department, it is entitled to immunity from suit under the 11th Amendment.The 11th Amendment provides, in relevant part: `The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State[.] [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 10:18 pm by JP Sarmiento
She came to the United States from the Philippines and obtained her green card through the National Interest Waiver process in 2008. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:52 am by admin
The Court in Sheehan came to a twofold interpretation of strict liability for injuries suffered due to violation of state building codes. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:35 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
Supreme Court’s recognized in concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Many judges have relied upon that precedent in ruling against state bans on same-sex marriage, and the Supreme Court  commented favorably on that ruling a year ago in June when it struck down a federal law denying marital benefits to same-sex couples who were already legally married (United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:55 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Clapis, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida explained NIED in the context of car accidents. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:55 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Clapis, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida explained NIED in the context of car accidents. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:53 am by Joy Waltemath
Next, it asked him when he came to the United States, and he answered that he had arrived 10 years previously. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
United States (1971) and United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
Code § 2255 seeking a new trial “on the basis that “her trial attorney was so ineffective as to deprive her of the competent counsel guaranteed by the 6th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in United States history. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:51 am
The Supreme Court of Carolina, in the All Saints Waccamaw decision, came down clearly against deference to hierarchical tribunals (i.e., as in Watson v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]