Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 5001 - 5020 of 12,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
Thus RULLCA Section 701 (a) (4) defines as an event of dissolution: (4) on application by a member, the entry by [the appropriate court] of an order dissolving the company on the grounds that: (A) the conduct of all or substantially all the company’s activities and affairs is unlawful; (B) it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the company’s activities and affairs in conformity with the certificate of organization and the operating… [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
Thus RULLCA Section 701 (a) (4) defines as an event of dissolution: (4) on application by a member, the entry by [the appropriate court] of an order dissolving the company on the grounds that: (A) the conduct of all or substantially all the company’s activities and affairs is unlawful; (B) it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the company’s activities and affairs in conformity with the certificate of organization and the operating… [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 8:41 pm
") Of course, in this case, the term "fiduciary" was used by Congress in §36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940: "the investment adviser of a registered investment company shall be deemed to have a fiduciary duty with respect to the receipt of compensation for services. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:55 pm
On reading this, the Dutch Supreme Court acknowledged that the Den Bosch Court of Appeal had applied the correct test for assessing the distinctive character of a shape (Joined Cases C-456/01 P and C-457/01P Henkel KGaA v OHIM; Case C-25/05 August Storck KG v OHIM and Joined Cases C-53/01, C-54/01 and C-55/01, Linde AG). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:03 am by Maria Kennedy (UK)
See also this link for a further exploration of parent company liability for human rights impacts overseas. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 10:03 pm by News Desk
 The HACCP plan fails to identify and control for the C. botulinum hazard present in these products,” FDA stated. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:36 am by A.J. Jackson and Jay Ramsey
  For example, if a parent company operates under two gendered hair dye brands, could the brands sell similarly crafted dye for women at a higher price than for men, or would that constitute a violation by the company under Section 391-U? [read post]
The FTC took unprecedented action yesterday when it moved to impose what it describes as a “blanket prohibition” preventing the company from monetizing young people’s data. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 11:14 am by Paul E. Freehling
She (a) held that TRA did not infringe Kantar’s patents, (b) dismissed TRA’s misappropriation claim as a discovery sanction, (c) ruled that TRA’s allegedly confidential information did not constitute trade secrets, (d) held that TRA submitted insufficient evidence to support a claim for damages, and (e) denied TRA’s requests for injunctive relief relating to allegations of a breach of fiduciary duty and for a jury trial on compensatory damages. [read post]