Search for: "Cooper v. State"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 7,450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2016, 8:46 am
D.K.D. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 11:19 am
Amdocs v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Perhaps it should be called the Littman Effect, after the First Department's 2008 decision in Littman v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:04 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
Dorsen wrote his latest book with the cooperation of the justice. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
See id.; see generally Cox Operating, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 8:10 pm
.; Citron v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
As a reminder, and as stated in Dhont v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:16 am
In 2014, the Supreme Court of China ('the SPC') heard a copyright case: Huagai Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
An Antique Platter of Gold ("Golden Phiale") and the recently decided Republic of Turkey v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 9:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
Oh, and let's return briefly to the 1709 Blog: While the United States has its Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator (IPEC: here, with links to earlier posts), most of Europe seems to be missing the point, assuming that the way to deal with the big anti-counterfeiting issues is for more pan-European cooperation between OHIM and national offices. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
” Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 4:54 pm
IndiaUmesh Kumar v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
” Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
While article L. 113-2 of the French Intellectual Property (IP) Code defines “composite work” as a “work in which a pre-existing work is incorporated without the cooperation of the author of the latter,” article L. 113-4 merely states that such work “is the property of the author who made it, subject to the rights of the author of the original work” but not explain its rationale further. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
Cooper v Turrell, heard 24 November 2011 (Tugendhat J) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd, heard 28 November 2011 (Eady J) Phillips v NGN, heard 28 and 29 November 2011 (Judge CJ, Neuberger MR, Kay V-P) El-Naschie v Macmillan, heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011 (Sharp J) Also on Inforrm last week News: Defamation in Israel – are the proposed amendments to the law objectionable? [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
It can be difficult to hold governmental bodies accountable based on regulatory authority using the modified Anns/Cooper test in conjunction with Edwards v. the Law Society of Upper Canada.. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 7:31 pm
However, in Lobo v. [read post]
