Search for: "Cross v. Cross" Results 5001 - 5020 of 21,871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2011, 9:00 pm
Continue reading "Federal judge gives full teeth to Brady v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
He further added: vii) If the line between legitimate freedom of expression and a threat to public order has indeed been crossed, freedom of speech will not have been impaired by “ruling …out” threatening, abusive or insulting speech: per Lord Reid, in Brutus v Cozens [1973] AC 854, at p. 862. viii) The legislature has entrusted the decision in a case such as the present to Magistrates or a District Judge. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
The 9th did find for the government in its cross appeal that an 841(b)(1)(B) mandatory sentence should apply because of a prior state drug conviction.Larson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 10:03 am by Nick Armstrong
An increasing number of cases, including most recently ZN (Afghanistan) v SSHD [2018] 3 Costs LO 357, recognise this reality. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of Roth's cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, Supreme Court properly granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 5:23 am
The 9th does state that such information must be given to defense counsel AND that counsel must be allowed to vigorously cross examine on this issue.US v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
We've been doing some research in anticipation of the upcoming ALI meeting at which the Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation will be voted on (we hope ALI members interested in class actions and the like will come out, debate the issues, and vote), and in the spirit of cross-fertilization, we thought we'd share it with our readers. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 12:19 pm by Erica Goldberg
Yet, perhaps Cox crossed a line by not just speaking objectionably, but by speaking for purposes other than communication. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
The case concerned the question of how cross-claims between two credit institutions are to be dealt with in insolvency proceedings in two different member states of the European Economic Area (EEA). [read post]
23 May 2008, 7:20 am by Ann
The Court of Appeal has now reached its decision in Actavis UK v Merck Co, Inc. [read post]