Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 16,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2019, 4:54 am
” Slip op. at 7 (citing DeLucca v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:20 am
The State appealed. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 8:48 am
Br. at 24, Ashcroft v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
United States, 140 S. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:44 pm
By contrast, in People v Bush (2009 NY Slip Op 07066 [4th Dept 10/2/09]) the Court held thatContrary to the contention of defendant, his right of confrontation was not violated by the admission in evidence of a certified abstract of a registration record of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:03 am
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:13 am
In today's decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:05 am
Z.o.o. and Ors v Jakubowski and Ors. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:24 am
Something must ‘cross the line’ between the parties sufficient to manifest an assent to the assumption. [read post]
26 May 2011, 11:36 am
Schnall v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 7:47 am
WRB, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:27 pm
The Grand Chamber stated in Cumpana v Romania on 17 December 2004 at paragraph 91, in the context of a publication covered by Article 10, that Article 8 “may require the adoption of positive measures designed to secure effective respect for private life even in the sp [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
In Tirado v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:09 pm
On June 9, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 7:33 am
United States v, Driggers,__ F.3d __, No. 07-31090, 2009 WL 692003 (9th Cir. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am
From Wednesday until Thursday 13 February 2014 is the matter of McDonald (Deceased) v National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc and its cross-appeal. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:23 am
Can they still do that when the President of the United States has confirmed the records’ existence via tweet? [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:49 am
Needless to say, the lack of opportunity to cross-examine any out-of-court declarants would be a significant problem, and might still cause the judge to discount or even exclude such statements. [read post]
