Search for: "DOES 2-25" Results 5001 - 5020 of 16,500
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” The president indicates in a signing statement that this section does not “dictate the position of the United States in external military and foreign affairs. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:06 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
All documents referred to shall be [...](4) Any part of a party's appeal case which does not meet the requirements in paragraph 2 is to be regarded as an amendment, unless the party demonstrates that this part was admissibly raised and maintained in the proceedings leading to the decision under appeal. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 9:38 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The re-stated test as per the three-judge Bench is as follows:"Two working tests laid down in paragraph 25 are: "(1) does this plea [of fraud] permeate the entire contract and above all, the agreement of arbitration, rendering it void, or (2) whether the allegations of fraud touch upon the internal affairs of the parties inter se having no implication in the public domain. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 9:24 am by Dennis Crouch
  The invalidated claim in GE was written as follows: 25. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 8:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Section 92 of the BNA Act is a source of lawmaking authority, but does not regulate any acts of law related to municipal government or constitutionalize any particular form under s. 92(8). [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 10:52 am by Dan Harris
China Sourcing: Does Your Sales Contact Really Work At The Factory? [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 12:12 pm by Corbin Bridge
Now Amazon truly does have more than a foot in the door to the pharmaceutical market. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
Section 10 demonstrates the goodwill of Parliament that Parliament can and will function to protect the interests of each part of the United Kingdom, even in the absence of meaningful representation in Westminster. 11:25: Ronan Lavery QC says absence of consideration of NI in these circumstances is gross. 11:21:& [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 Such penalties and fines, imposed separately by each card association, can include: Hefty fines (in multiples of $100,000) for prohibited data retention; Significant additional monthly fines (can be $100,000 or more per month depending on the nature of the data stored) assessed until confirmation is provided indicating that prohibited data is no longer stored; Separate fines (in multiples of $10,000) for PCI-DSS non-compliance; Additional monthly fines (likely $25,000 per month) assessed until… [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 5:00 pm by Nate Nead
Now Amazon truly does have more than a foot in the door to the pharmaceutical market. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 11:28 am by Christina Kroll and Divya Taneja
Data brokers are defined in the bill as businesses that knowingly collect and sell to third parties the personal information of a consumer with which it does not have a direct relationship. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 11:28 am by Christina Kroll and Divya Taneja
Data brokers are defined in the bill as businesses that knowingly collect and sell to third parties the personal information of a consumer with which it does not have a direct relationship. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:31 am by Jonathan Bailey
They claim that 25 “managers” have been identified but there is no word on arrests. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:47 pm by Giles Peaker
In 2017, Mr Beattie admitted to 8 tenanted properties and 25 tenants, but denied it was profitable. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 10:48 am by Taylor A. Bloom and Alan L. Friel
Training AB 25 expands the provision in Section 1798.130(a)(6) regarding training personnel responsible for handling privacy inquiries to address additional [read post]
The California legislative session for 2019 ended on September 13 and the following five amendments to the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) were passed: AB 25, 874, 1146, 1355, and 1564. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 8:16 pm by Lindsey Tonsager and Libbie Canter
  The bill clarifies that the CCPA’s private right of action does not apply if personal information is either encrypted or redacted. [read post]