Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 5001 - 5020 of 107,994
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2012, 11:18 am by CMLP Staff
On appeal, Jenzabar argued that the court improperly granted summary judgment because it did not adequately focus on a particular type of confusion, "initial interest confusion. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:05 am by Ken Lammers
Not to be deterred, the Court of Appeals has tried again in Taylor v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:32 am by SOIssues
In that case, the justices said that civil commitment "does not require the criminal law burden of proof," appeals court Judge Diana Gribbon Motz wrote. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 9:30 pm by Patricia Salkin
But, the concept does not cover any activity simply because it takes place on the premises. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:26 pm by Narendra Ghosh
§ 160A-288 does not apply, the Court should conclude that Garner and N.C. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:18 am by Eleonora Rosati
According to that court, unanimous consent would not be required.A final appeal to the Italian Supreme Court did follow. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 10:51 am by Diana L. Skaggs
The Court of Appeals again affirms the Family Court finding no error as the Court property considered the KRS 403.200(2) factors noting “efforts to secure employment” are not a part of KRS 403.200(2). [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Appeal of Janice Walters from action of the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Cortland, Superintendent Laurence Spring and Lydia Eberenz-Rosero regarding the appointment of an elementary principal, Decisions of the Commissioner of Education... [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:34 pm by Peter Vodola
So ruled the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday, August 25, 2011, in a case that was described in earlier Secondary Insurance Market Blog posts here and here. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:39 am by Barsumian Armiger
On appeal, the Indiana Court of Appeals first addressed Stanley’s argument that Burns had a common law duty to clear the sidewalk because Burns “controlled the premises. [read post]
This appeals court decision means that violating physicians will face criminal charges and up to two years in prison. [read post]