Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 5001 - 5020 of 9,560
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Id. at *6-7 (text added).The Absence of an Embodiment Does Not Limit Plain and Ordinary Meaning[The] disclosed embodiment undisputedly uses a cable to convey data, and the patent does not disclose an alternative embodiment that uses a wireless datalink. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 8:39 am by satwood
This is a good sign, because the alarm is set for 4:35 a.m. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 10:20 am
[This raises an interesting question, says Merpel: if the Commission was not undertaking an economic activity or an industrial activity, what does it need a Community trade mark for? [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
[…] this court addressed infringement, under section 271(e)(2)(A), of the same patent at issue in Elan, by the same generic drug at issue in Elan, but for a different does of that drug. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 4:54 am by David DePaolo
By contrast, only 35 of the 77 individuals convicted of premium fraud or failing to provide coverage were sentenced to jail. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 10:55 am
The leukemia drug Gleevec earns more than $4 billion a year for Novartis, $35 billion since it came onto the market. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 8:00 am by Dennis Crouch
In the recent Alice Corp[1] decision, the US Supreme Court set out a framework for assessing whether claims are patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:29 am by Robin Shea
Documentation is no guarantee that there won’t be a fact dispute, but it does tend to make it harder for the plaintiff to claim that something different happened. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 2:18 pm by emagraken
Justice Baird rejected this argument and set out the following reasons clarifying when an insured is entitled to revive TTD benefits with ICBC: [35]         Following Brewer, Halbauer, and Cai, insured persons currently have a right to revive their TTDs (assuming all the other regulatory requirements are met) in three situations: 1. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Its 35 years of innovation as a sophisticated support service has saved LAO millions of dollars. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 2:38 pm by John Stigi
  The United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, holding that (1) plaintiffs’ section 36(b) claim was barred because the SEC had issued an Exemption Notice expressly permitting BTC to charge the 35% lending fee and (2) section 36(a) does not provide a private right of action. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:38 am by Dennis Crouch
 I largely attribute the change to two initiatives pushed by David Kappos during his term as PTO Director that resulted in (1) more funding to hire more examiners; and (2) a greater allowance rate. [read post]