Search for: "Ex Parte Day"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 6,748
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2011, 3:35 am
centers around claims that the judge had ex parte communication with social worker and improperly took into consideration allegations that defendant had previously abused the victim, his 5-year-old son. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:00 pm
The day-to-day reality of shared physical custody can become a healthy, routine part of your new life, or a constant source of frustration and anger. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am
Northgate Technologies, Inc (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) CAFC: Ex parte contact with USPTO Examiners: Radio Systems Corp. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
Bell in Charlottesville on that day. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:24 pm
Blomberg, it seems that when the day came around for Rep. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:41 am
Review of a finding of an SNQ in an order granting ex parte or inter partes reexam (see 75 FR 36357) No (but see 75 FR 36357in ex parte reexam) No. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:17 am
--Counsel for a person who is financially unable to obtain investigative, expert, or other services necessary for adequate representation may request them in an ex parte application. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:10 am
Nine days later, the same examiners issued an Office Action in the ‘614 patent reexamination. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:52 pm
In March of that year, Kunin published a notice in the USPTO Official Gazette explaining further limitations on the examination corps in dealing with non-party contact with examiners during ex parte prosecution. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:18 pm
Do you support your ex-spouse through spousal maintenance, or alimony, payments? [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:30 am
Obiter, it would in any event have been possible to seek permission under Order 45 r 3 by way of an ex-parte application. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:30 am
Obiter, it would in any event have been possible to seek permission under Order 45 r 3 by way of an ex-parte application. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:28 am
However, part of the problem of using these guidelines is that some terms are supercharged with more-than-meets-the-eye meaning. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:47 pm
Do they tell you to do that as part of your training? [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:53 am
The personal jurisdiction holding in this case will be discussed in a different post, but here I wanted to bring up the interesting facts regarding Accession's ex parte contact with the USPTO regarding Radio System's pending patent application. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
: A UPSTO green patent fast track update (Green Patent Blog) Concentration of patent cases in the Eastern District of Texas (Patently-O) Surviving patent reexamination (Patents Post-Grant) The more the merrier: The Journal joins the Times in complaining about patents (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in In re Tanaka: Patentee may add narrower claims in reissue, at least for now: (Reexamination Alert) (Orange Book Blog) (Patently-O) (America-Israel Patent Law) (Patents… [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
Assuming that the Supreme Court doesn't do anything crazy in the Wal-Mart case, the law is, for the most part, in the right place, and it's just a question of judges exercising their responsibility to apply it correctly - which is hard to do when the settling parties are making an ex parte presentation to the court, and good-faith objectors don't have the financial incentive to hire a lawyer to make sure the court gets it right. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:10 pm
Review of a finding of an SNQ in an order granting ex parte or inter partes reexam (see 75 FR 36357) No (but see 75 FR 36357in ex parte reexam) No. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 2:03 pm
She just wants to be a part of the Dodgers. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 9:17 am
I only do this on high days and holy days…and it certainly made my Good Friday morning more amusing than it might otherwise have been. [read post]
