Search for: "FIRST BENEFITS INC" Results 5001 - 5020 of 12,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2019, 4:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To support its argument, Moretrench cites the decision of the Appellate Division, First Department, in Chatham Towers, Inc. v Castle Restoration & Constr., Inc. (151 AD3d 419 [I st Dept 2017]), which held that: “Common-law indemnification may be pursued by parties who have been held vicariously liable for the party that actually caused the negligence that injured the plaintiff. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 6:00 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
    The first 3 days of disability (the waiting period) are not paid to the injured employee unless the employee is disabled for more than 14 days. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
MetLife apparently first applied for and received J-51 benefits for the properties in 1992. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 3:38 pm
Apparently, this was not the first time that this insurance company was slapped on the wrist by a federal court. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 3:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
  In this post we will examine the first decision, Leviton Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
 In the high-tech morass that is ediscovery, parties have tried various ways to do something about the disparity between cost and benefit. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:03 pm by Dennis Crouch
First Quality Baby Products, LLC, No. 15-927 (laches in patent cases) Briefing: Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 7:58 am
The fraudulent business must be treated as the business the company carried on, said the court, in the first instance, to benefit the company.In dissent, Lord Mance noted that the world has sufficient experience of Ponzi schemes operated by individuals owning "one man" companies for it to be questionable policy to relieve from all responsibility auditors negligently failing in their duty to check and report on such companies' activities.Lord Mance also reviewed US… [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:54 am by Beth Graham
– El Paso, July 29, 2015), several workers filed various negligence complaints against their employer, boot manufacturer Lucchese Inc., in El Paso. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:40 am by Steven Boutwell
  Specifically, Section 510 of ERISA makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against employees for exercising their rights under a covered employee benefit plan, or for the purpose of interfering with their attainment of rights under a covered employee benefit plan (such as an employee group health benefit plan). [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 1:35 pm by Adam Weinstein
From March 1995, until August 2007, Bolton was associated with First Montauk Securities Corp. [read post]
19 May 2020, 10:11 am by Adam Feldman
American Association of Political Consultants Inc. and Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]