Search for: "Frank v. Frank" Results 5001 - 5020 of 6,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2021, 2:45 am by Jon L. Gelman
”    The organizations joining ADAO in these legal actions are the American Public Health Association (APHA); Center for Environmental Health (CEH); Environmental Information Association (EIA): Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families (SCHF); and Vermont Public Interest Research Group (VPIRG) Scientists participating are Barry Castleman, ScD; Raja Flores, MD; Arthur Frank, MD, PhD; Philip Landrigan, MD, MSc; Richard Lemen, PhD, MSPH; and Celeste Monforton, DrPH, MPH.To… [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:28 pm by Lisa Ouellette
As Michael previewed this morning, the Supreme Court heard argument today in Helsinn v. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 12:53 pm by Stephen Griffin
Rev. 1459 (2014)Nicole Huberfeld, Elizabeth Weeks Leonard, and Kevin Outterson, Plunging into Endless Difficulties: Medicaid and Coercion in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:43 am by Ben
The case is Nirvana LLC v Marc Jacobs International LLC et al. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Alfonso Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Stephen Bilkis
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004]) and the… [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 3:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
Braden, decided today by the Tennessee Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge Frank G. [read post]
3 May 2025, 2:19 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Seventh Circuit Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion concerning the denial of rehearing en banc in Kilborn v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004]) and the… [read post]