Search for: "French v. French" Results 5001 - 5020 of 5,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Julia Spiegel
Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
The political becomes religious in this sense that systems do not merely reflect collective customs, habits, traditions, or desires, but now represent the epistemology of truth that converts political fights to contests over the souls of national collectives and their people.Pix Credit HEREThe great contests for the conversion of the souls of people to a faith in the great political systems that emerged after the French and American Revolutions of the late 18th Century have become the great… [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 6:31 pm
 Pix Credit here I am delighted to circulate a rough discussion draft I have prepared in anticipation of its first presentation at a conference organized by the remarkable Martin Belov, Professor in Constitutional and Comparative Constitutional Law at the University of Sofia ‘St. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc   New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
It’s a problem because it’s dangerous for an American lawyer to opine about the situation in a French court. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am by Thalia Kruger
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: Mutilation v. destruction: people do debate which is worse. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
Provenance research initiatives at the Metropolitan Museum of Art (the Met) identified 53 works of art that were misappropriated by the Nazis that were “restituted to their rightful owners” and then purchased by or donated to the museum.[16] One example is a work by Claude Monet titled The Parc Monceau, painted in 1878.[17] The Nazis seized the painting from the bank of Jewish collector Alfred Lindenbaum and transported it to the Jeu de Paume, an art center in Paris the Nazis used to… [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm by INFORRM
Add that the Bill requires the platform to treat user content as illegal if it has no more than “reasonable grounds to infer” illegality, and we have baked-in over-removal at scale: a classic basis for incompatibility with fundamental freedom of speech rights; and the reason why in 2020 the French Constitutional Council held the Loi Avia unconstitutional. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:05 am by lopeznoriega
“Pocos principios jurídicos son tan fáciles de formular y tan difíciles de llevar a la práctica como el principio constitucional a la presunción de inocencia” Francisco Muñoz Conde, El País, 28 de septiembre de 2003   En los últimos días, los jóvenes han puesto en la agenda pública un tema fundamental: la democratización de los medios de comunicación. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am by Bill Merkel
Dicey (legislative omnipotence), Thomas Jefferson (departmentalism and active popular sovereignty that does not go dormant in non-Ackermanian moments), James Madison (a system of checks and balances reduced to a short code), or John Marshall (judicial supremacy based on an instrument that did not say a word about judicial supremacy when he wrote Marbury and continued silent on that point when his successors affixed each of their signatures to Aaron v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
(NBCU) is a media and entertainment company created by the merger of General Electric's (GE) NBC and French Media Group's Vivendi Universal Entertainment (Vivendi). [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm by Bruce Zagaris
We at the IELR send you the best wishes for a warm and joyous holiday season. 2020 was momentous for the international enforcement community, and we are grateful to have had you following along with our coverage. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 1:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
This faulty reasoning shows up in the district court opinion in Salinger v. [read post]