Search for: "German v. German"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 5,202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2007, 9:12 am
"Sterile," "ungodly boring," "it works but the same way the German war production worked. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:58 am
Deutsche Telekom, which I summarized in November, and Nacre v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 8:27 am
See V. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 9:17 am
Georgia Television Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
(UK Channel Management Ltd v E! [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 2:21 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 5:57 pm
From the 19th Century German classic, "The Dreadful Story of Pauline and the Matches," in which the fate of the child heroine can be deduced from the title, to the more familiar Thirties cult film, "Reefer Madness," the protagonist almost never does well in them. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
In UMG v. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 12:06 am
In Melzer v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 5:42 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:07 pm
Denmark, paragraph 45; and Case C-24/00 Commission v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:04 am
Although the Dutch courts tend to lean towards a somewhat less dogmatic approach than their German counterparts, the rules established in these cases resemble the German theory of reciprocal effect or Wechselwirkung between fundamental rights and private law.Using Italian and English law as touchstones, representing a Romanistic and a Common Law perspective respectively, it has been confirmed that fundamental rights have affected the development of private law doctrines. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 3:59 pm
Bumper v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 11:43 am
PSEG Power New York, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 10:57 pm
For those who prefer briefs to boxers, a periodic collection of fashionable events in the judicial system:Bar(red): Gap appeals South African trademark decisionSuffer the children: Gap under fire for abusive child labor in IndiaShe sees France: Paris Hilton sued for stealing panty-flasher's styleBay watch: Ninth Circuit sends PerfumeBay to watery grave in dilution caseContradiction in terms: Dueling Unique clothing firms in expensive trademark disputeBlind Alley: North Face wins damages in… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 4:01 am
Borochoff v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
Springfield, IL 62704 Phone: (217) 782-9696 (V/TTY) Fax: (217) 524-5339 Web: http://www.state.il.usagency/ipcdd Down Syndrome Down Syndrome Development Counsel P.O. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 12:51 am
As Matthew Levitt, a partner at Lovells has stated, the Commission will only be further encouraged to pursue zero-tolerance against governmental restrictions, and this will only serve to increase the potential for cross-border mergers.[26] ____________ Endnotes: [1] Case C-112/05, Comm'n v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 1:45 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
