Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2010, 7:51 am
Permission had been refused on the papers, but Rimer LJ had given permission on an oral application limited to certain grounds only. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:49 am
After my post defending aspects of the Court's opinion in Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:51 am
Permission had been refused on the papers, but Rimer LJ had given permission on an oral application limited to certain grounds only. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:37 am
Sabella v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:42 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:50 am
In the case, Rash v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 5:35 am
The recent decision of Kim v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:42 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:50 am
In the case, Rash v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:56 am
In the recent case of Haugesund Kommune, Narvik Kommune v Depfa ACS Bank, Wikborg Rein & Co [2011] EWCA Civ 33, the Court of Appeal overturned the first instance judgment against a firm of solicitors for breach of its contractual duty of care, holding that the negligent advice given by the solicitors had to be the direct cause of loss which, in turn, had to be within the scope of the solicitors' duty.Wikborg Rein (Wikborg), a firm of Norwegian solicitors, appealed against… [read post]
22 May 2007, 10:03 am
Given the harm inflicted, the sentence does not strike the court as grossly disproportionate, and given the precedent in three-strike and other Eighth Amendment cases, this challenges fails.US v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:15 pm
This is unsurprising given that their legal proceedings and application to Strasbourg predated the CJEU’s decision in Google Spain in which the right to be forgotten (in respect of search engines) was given judicial recognition. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
” Ignoring for the moment that ambiguity, if a court concludes that retrogression would result under a given proposal, the Supreme Court said in Upham v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is AFL Telecommunications, LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:34 am
Given that political discrimination claims will always involve a clash between two parties’ respective conscience, it’s hard to tell what is left of FETO after this case. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:50 am
Given the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance, it's far from clear why reliance was missing here, as the dissent pointed out. ... [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:58 am
Following the decision in Cook v Telegraph Media Group [2011] EWHC 763 (QB) on 29 March 2011 the defendant applied to vary the mode of trial to judge alone. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
In Bellotti v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Comment Supreme Court grants of permissions to appeal are, of course, given without much in the way of explanation. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:44 am
The Delhi High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Manushi Sangathan v. [read post]
