Search for: "Grant v. State" Results 5001 - 5020 of 61,134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Why this is working in this way is perfectly summed up in this decision out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Curtis v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 11:34 am
The US Supreme Court this morning granted certiorari in Vaden v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:22 pm by NARF
State of Alaska, Dept. of Health & Social Serivces, Office of Children's Services (Indian Child Welfare Act) State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 7:15 am by Ilya Somin
Only Congress has the power to spend money or impose conditions on federal grants to states. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am by HANNAH WILCE
 In January 2014 the prison granted him access to the SFCL on his individual phone account but not for other inmates. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:08 am by William C. Martinez
Perlmutter the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted the USCO’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that “human authorship is an essential part of a valid copyright claim. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:08 am by William C. Martinez
Perlmutter the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted the USCO’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that “human authorship is an essential part of a valid copyright claim. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:08 am by William C. Martinez
Perlmutter the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted the USCO’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that “human authorship is an essential part of a valid copyright claim. [read post]
12 May 2009, 10:16 am
In a published en banc decision released today, NMCCA rejected a challenge to the new Article 120.United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am by Daniel Tokaji
  That’s understandable, especially since the Supreme Court’s cert. grant in Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:17 am by Ayesha Christie, Matrix
Although ECHR, art 3 protects against the appellant’s removal to Sri Lanka, he is only granted discretionary leave to remain for renewable periods of 30 months. [read post]