Search for: "Gunning v. Doe"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 5,359
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2008, 5:45 am
"
New York Law Journal
See City of New York v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 5:45 am
"
New York Law Journal
See City of New York v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:51 am
Lojas v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Rees, No. 07-5439 Kentucky's lethal injection protocol used as its method of execution does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 4:21 am
Normally, consent does not extend to the persons of guests not shown to be linked to the crime under investigation, but here the search of the bag was reasonably related to officer safety because it was clearly large enough to hold a gun. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 2:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
What I mean is, you remember yesterday where I asked a bunch of questions about that story where Mike Moore said he got a text message from Lon Stallings debunking Judge Lackey's testimony in the Jones v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 2:12 pm
US v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:12 pm
See Thoughts on United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 2:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:46 pm
US v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:36 am
In Lewis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 5:59 pm
" M'Culloch v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
Blawgletter’s gut reacted very badly to the Court’s recent uninsured-motorist decision, Nationwide Insurance Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 8:22 am
Brown v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 9:15 am
So, as the law stands now, if one exchanges a gun for drugs, one "uses" the gun in a drug transaction and is eligible for a stiffer sentence, but, if one exchanges drugs for a gun, one does not "use" the gun and will get a lighter sentence. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:58 am
See also slip op. at 17 n.7 (distinguishing Klay v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:38 am
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) from putting its new claims and continuation rules into effect (SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:02 am
Foster v. [read post]
