Search for: "Hall v. Hall"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 6,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Justice Bennett in R v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:11 am
The main item on the menu, entitled "A Gallic infringement", is an attempt by Lord Hoffmann and Sir Robin Jacob to roast French IP practitioner Maître Pierre Véron. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am
This confirms and arguably extends the present position under the Data Protection Act 1998 following the “striking down” of section 13(2) by the Court of Appeal in the Vidal Hall case. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:18 am
Like he would be in the later Plessy v. [read post]
The Data Protection Act: a stone to sling at the Facebook Goliath? – Rhory Robertson and Sophie Pugh
28 Jul 2014, 5:10 pm
Following the recent decision in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc. ([2014] EWHC 13 (QB)), it seems that the English Courts are looking more favourably on applications of English Claimants to invoke (or invite) the jurisdiction of the English Courts to hear cases in this “developing area” of law. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 3:40 pm
I've also put up a lightly revised draft of Executing Retributivism, a paper I mentioned a few weeks ago about the implications of the Supreme Court's decision in Panetti v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 5:05 pm
” PPF Safeguard, LLC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:09 am
Additional Resources: Barnett v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 11:42 am
” So it is possible there could be another PUC battle on the horizon - or perhaps in the halls of Congress. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 8:20 am
Freedom of religion and belief On Tuesday, the Commons held a short debate in Westminster Hall on freedom of religion and belief. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:14 am
This idea among others has extended from the grassroot levels to the Halls of Justice, with consequences ranging from the interesting to the appalling. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 6:20 pm
" Id. at *4 (citing Ellingsworth v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 5:00 am
Jennifer Davis: Sunday’s program included the interesting presentation: “Hachette Book Grp. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 7:03 am
Ratonel et al v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
Firstly, the IPCC and the Metropolitan Police v The Guardian (clause 1). [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
First up is Garland v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
They note that in Becerra v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:12 pm
In what reads like a brisk fifty-two-minute argument this morning, the Justices seemed inclined – but not certain – to accept, in Dietz v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 3:56 am
Descarga el documento: USA v. [read post]
