Search for: "High v State"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 35,514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2021, 8:45 am
NCAA and National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:59 am
The majority opinion in Bush v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew… [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 9:02 pm
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY CORVALLIS, OREGON BriefFull CLOSING THE GAPS: FOOD SAFETY EDUCATION AND OUTREACH TO UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES IN THE LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY 2021 2021 2021-05668 Yemmireddy, V. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 11:50 am
The case, Mahanoy Area School District v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 7:53 am
The penalty for not using the Convention’s Article 5 mechanism can be high. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 5:20 am
In Prakash Singh v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 9:24 pm
Four months earlier, the Supreme Court had decided Zubik v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 7:47 pm
One explanation for this trend is the recent Delaware Supreme Court decision Salzberg v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 11:35 am
District Court Judge Andrew Hanen in State of Texas et al. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 11:23 am
Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm
The hurdle was not an especially high one. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 11:47 am
Overturning Tiffany v. eBay In 2010, the Second Circuit issued a watershed decision about secondary trademark infringement. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 3:26 am
Bozzi v. [read post]
