Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL" Results 5001 - 5020 of 15,745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2023, 4:06 am by Will Baude
Judges, when they're enforcing a rule that comes from outside themselves, might have to enforce a rule that isn't exactly the same as the reasons for the rule. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:14 am
Court Widens Standard for Legal Malpractice Claims New Jersey Law Journal A New Jersey appeals court has ruled that a legal malpractice claim is not precluded by settlement of the underlying case, poking a hole in a state doctrine barring such claims. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 7:03 am by Howard Iken
We look forward to her continued success at Ayo and Iken. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 8:58 am by BiziBoom Blog
 Learn how BizBuilder™ can help you systematically and continuously attack the most demanding legal challenges your Arizona business faces.Who is Scott F. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am by Frank Cranmer
The Atlas currently covers 12 countries, 13 RBMs and four policy areas (Legal status of RBMs, marriage and family law, spiritual assistance, religious/belief symbols). [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:17 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) An “intimate partners without benefits” case, from In re Adoption of G., N.Y. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am by Carl Neff
—coupled with the recent amendments nullifying bylaw fee-shifting, directors and officers of Delaware stock corporations must continue to understand the risks of potential litigation in connection with any merger, transaction, or other stockholder dispute, and seek adequate legal representation to minimize the potential for intra-corporate litigation. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am by Carl Neff
—coupled with the recent amendments nullifying bylaw fee-shifting, directors and officers of Delaware stock corporations must continue to understand the risks of potential litigation in connection with any merger, transaction, or other stockholder dispute, and seek adequate legal representation to minimize the potential for intra-corporate litigation. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 5:44 am by Bridget Crawford
State intestacy statutes have continuously increased amounts allocated to surviving spouses. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:59 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Notably, Eikenberry filed just days ago an amended complaint attempting to re-plead the existence of an oral partnership. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 3:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Those doctrines have to do with factual or legal conclusions set forth in that case with regard to the particular details of the case—for instance, that a criminal defendant was found guilty (res judicata), that a plaintiff lost the case (also res judicata), that the court found a particular fact against a party (collateral estoppel), and so on. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:39 am by Roel van Woudenberg
With communication of 11 December 2008 the Receiving Section issued a noting of loss of rights pursuant to Rule 112(1) EPC in respect of European application No. 05 858 797.3, informing the original applicant that the application was deemed to be withdrawn (Rule 160(1) EPC) for non-performance of the acts required by Rule 159(1) EPC for entry into the European phase.VI. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:27 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
“Consequently,” the Court ruled, “the petition alleges a demonstrated risk to petitioner’s rights — chiefly continued future tax and other financial liabilities arising from respondent’s oppressive conduct” — sufficient to grant dissolution. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:47 pm by Stewart Baker
 We’re all a little uncomfortable with the new places that information technology is taking us. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 7:34 am by Andrew Delaney
This is a fancy lawyer way of saying you need to continue to have skin in the game, or a dog in the hunt, or [insert idiom here]. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 7:34 am by Andrew Delaney
This is a fancy lawyer way of saying you need to continue to have skin in the game, or a dog in the hunt, or [insert idiom here]. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 7:02 am by Elizabeth Grimm Arsenault
Obama’s Executive Order 13491 closed the legal loopholes that permitted torture, but the broader question of how to handle detainees captured in a fight against terrorism continues to confound U.S. policymakers. [read post]