Search for: "In Interest of Doe" Results 5001 - 5020 of 134,786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2008, 10:59 am
From Time's Jay Newton-Small (I never heard of her either): An interesting endorsement for Obama today. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 pm
In New Jersey, the Supreme Court of New Jersey ruled that Padilla does not have retroactive effect. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 7:29 pm
Wisconsin Lawyer (via Overlawyered via JuryVox) has an interesting article on the impact a juror's political bent has on the amount of damages awarded in personal injury cases. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 7:29 pm
Wisconsin Lawyer (via Overlawyered via JuryVox) has an interesting article on the impact a juror's political bent has on the amount of damages awarded in personal injury cases. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 11:20 am by Carolyn Elefant
What does your retainer agreement show about you and your practice? [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:56 am by Rob Vischer
"   So if Coca-Cola played a role, does that change our analysis of the decision to withdraw? [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:29 pm
  None of which really matter, but that bear mention regardless.First, why a "Doe"? [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
However, a "loss" does not extend to potential business opportunities, especially speculative ones -- like the kind that may develop from connecting on LinkedIn. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 12:13 pm by KevinH
However, section 9-27-341 does not contain any such requirement, and this court has held that section 9-27-355 is not relevant to a request for TPR. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:36 pm by Howard Friedman
"  That language does not appear in the Indiana law.The Arkansas law defines "compelling governmental interest" to mean "a governmental interest of the highest magnitude that cannot otherwise be achieved without burdening the exercise of religion. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 6:05 pm
  Check out Miller's post for the rest of his opinion - I'll be interested to see how the Maine Supreme Court handles the case. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The Petitioners:(1) Challenged as arbitrary and capricious the July 15, 2020, DOE's remote teaching policy for the 2020-2021 school year issued in response to the Covid-19 pandemic; and(2) Sought a court order compelling DOE to allow Petitioners “and all others similarly situated" to telework remotely on full salary or without loss of leave.Essentially Petitioners’ motion sought a temporary restraining order [TRO] prohibiting DOE from forcing… [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The Petitioners:(1) Challenged as arbitrary and capricious the July 15, 2020, DOE's remote teaching policy for the 2020-2021 school year issued in response to the Covid-19 pandemic; and(2) Sought a court order compelling DOE to allow Petitioners “and all others similarly situated" to telework remotely on full salary or without loss of leave.Essentially Petitioners’ motion sought a temporary restraining order [TRO] prohibiting DOE from forcing… [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 7:44 am by Edward DeLisle
” The sad fact of the matter is that the proposed rule does not provide subcontractors any new rights under the Prompt Payment Act, nor does it affect the application of the interest provisions of the Prompt Payment Act. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 5:29 am by Legal Writer
Timing is key for those interested in filing a unilateral no-fault divorce. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 5:29 am by Legal Writer
Timing is key for those interested in filing a unilateral no-fault divorce. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 2:35 pm by Michael McCann
That might explain it although the language still interests me a great deal. [read post]