Search for: "JOHN DOES 1 -10" Results 5001 - 5020 of 9,149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Entertainment & Media Law Signal Manson v John Doe – Damages for Anonymous Online DefamationThe recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Manson v John Doe (2013 ONSC 628) offers an opportunity to reflect on both the procedures and outcomes of pursuing court actions for anonymous online defamation. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:51 am by Jordan Steiker
Perkins, John Bursch, Michigan’s Solicitor General, began his argument by insisting that this case is controlled by the “plain language” of Section 2244(d)(1)(D) of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, which establishes a one-year limitations period that runs from the date on which the “factual predicate” of the claim could have been discovered through the exercise of “due diligence. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:35 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Virginia court says yes  Hands-free isn't brain-free, distracted driving researchers say | CTV News Wikileaks defendant Manning pleads guilty lesser charges Spain Supreme Court strikes down city burqa ban Manson v John Doe - Damages for Anonymous Online Defamation Modern family: Federal Court of Canada recognizes employer's duty to accommodate childcare obligations  Arkansas Law Restricts When Abortion May Occur L.A. hotel sued over body in water tank Toronto 18… [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:52 pm by Robert Chesney
Support for imposing this constraint on belligerent targeting authority simply does not exist in LOAC treaties, customary international law, or the actual practice and opinio juris of states. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
I will first describe what law school does and does not provide its students. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
”  Congress has exclusive power over the time of presidential elections (Article II, Section 1). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:30 am by Linda McClain
We agree that a freestanding principle of autonomy does not operate in constitutional cases as a basis for deriving rights. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 8:54 am by Terry Hart
No, the Library does not still maintain this. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 10:33 am by Jay Stanley
And John Engler, president of the Business Roundtable, echoed their sentiments, saying "I think it's exactly fine." [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
By contrast, we work within the “deontological” liberal tradition of John Rawls and Ronald Dworkin, which famously stresses the “priority of liberty” over governmental pursuit of ends (Rawls) and formulates rights as “trumps” limiting government (Dworkin). [read post]