Search for: "JONES v. STATE." Results 5001 - 5020 of 6,828
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by INFORRM
The recent decision of the Mr Justice Christopher Clarke in Wallis v Meredith ([2011] EWHC 75 (QB)) resulted in the Claimant’s case being struck out on the basis that there had been no real or substantial tort following Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc ([2005] QB 946). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:35 am by Jon Sands
Fletcher and Jones, D.J., W.D. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Easton Enterprises et al (CAFC 2010-1057, -1116) precedential Tokai didn't get evidence in because of procedural error: failure to submit written reports for its experts, Jones and Sung. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
As a result, choice of law and jurisdiction rules potentially expose firms that do business nationally or internationally to oppressive law in any of the US states. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 2:01 pm by Matthew Nelson
Finally in People v Jones,  the Court in lieu of granting leave to appeal, reversed the Court of Appeals and reinstated the April 3, 2008 order of the Wayne Circuit Court granting the defendant credit for time served. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
Sudbury, MA Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2005. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:11 am
A quick summary of Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41, reported today:The facts: The parties were married in 1996, at which time the husband was the sole owner of a company. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:50 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41 (28 January 2011) Hope and Glory Public House Ltd, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Magistrates Court & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 31 (26 January 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Shah v General Pharmaceutical Council [2011] EWHC 73 (Admin) (28 January 2011) Jones v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC 50 (Admin) (27 January 2011) Oadby Hilltop… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
,” while at the same time concluding that the provisions of ICWA were inapplicable by stating that “these proceedings…actually escape applicable federal law on Indian Child Welfare. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
,” while at the same time concluding that the provisions of ICWA were inapplicable by stating that “these proceedings…actually escape applicable federal law on Indian Child Welfare. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:21 am
  A guy who does all he can do to leave the United States -- and does -- shouldn't be guity of being "found" in the U.S. involuntarily.So I'm going to have to disagree with Judges Willie Fletcher, Ray Fisher and James Jones (sitting by designation from Virginia) on this one.Which, by my count, makes the vote of Article III judges still 3-0. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:41 am
USPTO Director Kappos has stated that by including the PCT "more work can be shared between our two offices. [read post]